GordonG

Tuesday, September 08, 2009

God Hates Visionary Dreaming… (Bonhoeffer)

God Hates Visionary Dreaming… (Bonhoeffer)
-- Backyard Missionary

Do you reckon he could be onto something?!


“God hates visionary dreaming; it makes the dreamer proud and pretentious. The man who fashions a visionary ideal of community demands that it be realized by God, by others, and by himself. He enters the community of Christians with his demands, sets up his own law, and judges the brethren and God Himself accordingly. He stands adamant, a living reproach to all others in the circle of brethren. He acts as if he is the creator of the Christian community, as if his dream binds men together. When things do not go his way, he calls the effort a failure. When his ideal picture is destroyed, he sees the community going to smash. So he becomes, first an accuser of his brethren, then an accuser of God, and finally the despairing accuser of himself.” (Life Together)
(from here)


I don’t question that God actually does give people visions & dreams. I wonder if Bonhoeffer is referring more to that kind of visionary dreaming where we conjure up an idea to justify our existence.

I remember as a pastor having to come up with a vision for the year when occasionally there was no ‘vision’ beyond keeping going on the same track. I do think some of what masquerades as visionary dreaming is the stuff Bonhoeffer writes about - our own ego needs being expressed in the form of a corporate vision. And when we don’t achieve the vision we do so easily blame the community, God or ourselves.

How do you know if your vision is from God or is just something that you would like to achieve - especially when there is an element of pressure to keep on coming up with ‘vision’?

This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 18th, 2007


http://www.backyardmissionary.com/2007/07/god-hates-visionary-dreaming-bonhoeffer.html

Monday, September 07, 2009

“excellence” + “suitability” (stupid)

Excellent quality is not enough. Also required is suitability. In pursuit of wrong purposes, excellence is wrong…."
Theodore Levitt - The Marketing Imagination.

http://delldeaton.wordpress.com/2009/09/05/its-excellence-suitability-stupid/


Leaders vs Managers

There are people that need a large vision cast that captures their attention and motivates them to look for ways to make that vision into a reality. They will ask general questions to see what the boundaries are for the task, and then make things happen. They need to be checked on through out the project but given lots of room to make it happen.

There are also people who really don’t care about the big picture, but simply want to know exactly “what” it is that you want them to do. They want very specific instruction with a list if possible. They want feedback on each and every step.

This first person needs a leader.

The second needs a manager.


http://www.218consulting.com/2009/09/05/leading-versus-managing/



Framework for communicating change

Soul City Church

Soul City Church has developed a series of introductory videos in early preparation for their launch in 2010. really good 'vision'/purpose concepts included.
All videos downloaded to d:/.../*.scc.mp4

http://www.strategycentral.org/2009/09/7-is-greater-than-1.html

Monday, August 10, 2009

Aug10-Alerts

Tuesday, June 02, 2009

This is a video from the Social Innovations Network by Chip Heath of Stanford Graduate School of Business. http://sic.conversationsnetwork.org/shows/detail3318.html#

Creating the organizational "mission statement" is often the subject of eye rolling for employees of businesses and social enterprises alike. Frequently "missions by committee" end up sounding dry and boring. But, as the example of John F. Kennedy's mandate to put a man on the moon and return him safely to earth shows, mission statements are critical for galvanizing and guiding the work of any group, be it a nonprofit or a nation.

In this talk, part of the 2nd Annual Nonprofit Management Institute at Stanford in September 2007, Chip Heath, Stanford business professor, shares why an organization in the social sector needs a mission, what a good mission statement should do, and what the components of a successful mission statement are. He also addresses how you avoid mission creep—the problem of getting pulled in so many worthy directions that you don't end up addressing any of them particularly well.





Ten Things to Demand From Design Thinkers

BY Mark DzierskTue May 26, 2009 at 6:29 PM



http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/mark-dziersk/design-finds-you/ten-things-demand-design-thinkers





Design thinking
is currently an "It" concept, the topic of countless books and blogs
and conference panels. While it can mean a lot of different things to
different people, for me, design thinking is a methodology, a tool, a
killer app, and a problem-solving protocol to be used on virtually any
problem. It can be equally effective in designing a new product or
creating a new brand, to envisioning a new approach to health care or
to reinventing city management. Mayor Daley in Chicago, where I live,
is a pretty effective design thinker. That's right, Mayor Daley.



Design thinking isn't the sole province of the insular world of design
and designers. Every year, I learn this lesson over again in the class
I teach in "Design and Design Thinking" at Northwestern University. The
mostly left-brain, linear thinking, engineering professionals in the
class never fail to blow me away with how quickly and effectively they ladder up on the idea.



Today we are facing many tough problems in business, in our
communities, and in our society as a whole. This pliable and effective
methodology is truly part of the answer. Consequently, it has migrated
into the mainstream. It can be a great boon to problem solving, but
it's not without its pitfalls.



Here are ten things to get you need to know to make design thinking work for you:


  1. Get Clarity about Equity
    Brand equity
    used to belong to the Madmen of Madison Avenue. But advertising is
    broken now. It simply doesn't work like it used to, and won't ever
    again. Advertisers used to tell people what they want. Now customers,
    enabled by the Internet and social networks, are telling companies what
    they want. The truth of the consumer experience is in the doing and that
    is where the equity lies. Don't listen to anyone telling you what the
    brand equity "should" be if it doesn't start with the consumer.
  2. James DysonDesigners are the Storytellers

    Authenticity in the consumer experience results in a story, not the
    other way round. A story has emotion, narrative, and memories built
    into it. I tell stories in every presentation, every chance I can. In a
    world bloated with messages, a story is sometimes the only thing people
    will remember. When I mention James Dyson, they remember how
    discouraging he found it to see how vacuum cleaners work, how many
    prototypes it took to get the one he was designing right, how elated he
    was at figuring out the answer! Now Target can't keep Dyson cleaners on
    the shelf at $400 per; his competitors struggle at $99. The product
    performs; the story makes it memorable.
  3. The Ergonomics of Understanding

    Design thinking starts with empathy and perception around what people
    actually need and do, as opposed to what they say they want. This, in
    turn, mandates new processes for evaluation and new metrics for
    measurement. It may even require the courage to make decisions that run
    counter to metrics. That's the decision Herman Miller designers faced
    when focus groups told them that people thought the first Aeron chair would be a failure.
  4. Dutch Boy PaintGood Design is Good Business

    Rumor has it that Dutch Boy saw something in the neighborhood of a 300%
    lift after re-inventing its paint can to have a twist-off lid. 300% How
    many companies would be thrilled with a 7% increase in sales?
  5. Design Thinking Starts at the Very Beginning

    Design has always had a place in the product development process, but
    too often it's been in the middle, used as a way to improve a product's
    aesthetics, or at the end, when it's used to create attractive
    packaging, or a sizzling presentation for the client. But those design
    add-ons can't ensure success. Before setting off on any mission, design
    thinking protocol asks us to step back for a moment and begin by
    challenging the problem to be solved in the first place. Is this the
    right way to frame this problem? Does the world need another one of
    these gadgets? The answers to those questions potentially save a lot of
    wasted effort and ensure a better result.
  6. Designers Need to Be Orchestra Conductors

    Design thinkers need to be able to mobilize cross functional teams.
    That requires a skill set that includes effective leadership, the
    ability to inspire, respect of other competencies, and equal measures
    of charm and manic control. It's not the usual stuff you get in design
    school, but it should be.
  7. Keep Design Assassins in the Crosshairs

    "We did that here once. I t didn't work." "We tried that three years
    ago. Customers hated it." "That's not the way we do things here." How
    many times have you been in a meeting and heard comments like those?
    Or, worse, been the one making them? Keep it up and you to can become a
    Designosaur. Design thinkers figure out ways to overcome resistance to
    new ideas.
  8. Use Your Head Before Your Hands

    Design thinkers look past a project to the next project, to the next
    step in the strategy. They look sideways to the tangents that are
    affected by the result, and longer term to the investment required as a
    result of solving the problem currently in front of the team. No
    problem is solved in isolation--either from the past, or from the
    future.
  9. Be a Good Shepherd

    Most design thinkers agree that the goal for any project should be the
    best result for the smallest investment, and the biggest effect for the
    least amount of effort and the least amount of resources. Efficiency,
    in short, is at the core of every truly wonderful design or system.
  10. Obsessive Compulsives Welcome Here

    I remember once attending a meeting where I pointed out an obvious
    deficiency in design and was told that it would take too much time and
    effort to fix it, that the investment of capital and energy would not
    be worth the return. While it was, perhaps, true at the time, the
    incident raised concerns about the organization's culture and attitudes
    that led to that moment. "Good enough" is no longer good enough.
    There's now too much competition from a flattened world that's getting
    better at answering true consumer and societal needs. Maniacal
    attention to detail, obsessive attention to brand equity, and a
    laser-like focus on superlative results are all key parts of the
    formula for success in the future.


Read more of Mark Dziersk's Design Finds You blog



Welcoming Guest Blogger Mark Dziersk: "Creativity Plus Risk Gets You the Grade"



Mark Dziersk is the VP Design at Brandimage-Desgrippes & Laga, one of the world's largest design and branding firms.
At Brandimage, Dziersk has worked on projects for clients ranging from
Dove to Banana Republic to a pop-up store for Henri Bendel. Dziersk
joined Brandimage in 2007, after 13 years at the Chicago product design
firm Herbst Lazar Bell, where he and his teams won dozens of awards for
products as diverse as the Motorola NFL Coaches' Headset, to the
first-ever single use camera for Kodak. Dziersk, himself, holds over
100 patents
.



Dziersk gives back to his larger professional community as well,
having served on the board of the Industrial Designers Society of
America and as president of the Society in 1998. He also acted as
executive editor of IDSA's premier publication,
Innovation,
introducing new design elements and recruiting authors from outside the
design field. Mark's course, "Essentials of Industrial Design," in
Northwestern University’s Master of Product Development program,
helps left-brained types get comfy with their inner tattooed design
side.


What Does the Past have to do with Change? (Part 1 of 2)

What Does the Past have to do with Change? (Part 1 of 2)

 

John Holm

John Holm

Change happens.  You can fight change but you can’t stop it.  Without change, organizations die.  These and many other saying about change are often thrown around by consultants and proponents of change.  They are true.  We have recently seen how the inability of GM to change over the last 30-50 years has now caught up with them.  Things changed in the car industry and they did not.  They simply were living in their past glory, thinking that if they just did more of what made them successful in the past (and did it even better) that they would rise again to glory.  Many churches in the U.S. have had the same relationship with change.  Culture has changed, yet churches have not embraced changing along the way to address how to live out God’s mission in the world.  Many churches continue to simply try to do what they did in the past, in the same way they did it – but only “better.”  But doing the same thing “better” is not change. 

I am working with a church that had been on target for mission and had faithfully carried out their mission in the 1950’s – 1980’s.  Then a slow decline took hold.  Today, they are nothing like they once were.  Recognizing that fact, they brought in an expert to tell them what change needed to happen.  The expert told them to jettison the past, loose the dead weight and do many new things that research showed were the trends in growing churches.  They brought in a new pastor who did just that.  He discounted their identity from the past and tried to create a new and exciting identity for the future.  After some initial excitement (and anger) the “new thing” began to stall out.  Interestingly enough, when I read the recommendations of the “expert” I saw many great ideas that I have seen work in many places.  So why didn’t they work?  What was holding them back?

One of the great and early heresies in the church was Marcionism.  Marcion held that a new thing was being done in Jesus Christ (true).  He also taught that the past (the Hebrew God and God Yahweh) was bad and of a lower realm than was Jesus and the new way (not true).  When Marcion looked back, all he could see was a God of wrath and judgment.  When he looked at Jesus he saw mercy and grace.  Marcion sought to move forward in Jesus by demonizing the past.  Of course the church understood that God and God’s values and promises of mercy and grace have always been the same and will always be the same.  There is abundant mercy and grace in the Hebrew scriptures and instead of severing the connection with the past we need to begin where Jesus began.  In Matthew 5:17 Jesus said, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not t0 abolish but to fulfill.”  Things were changing drastically in and through Jesus Christ.  God and God’s promises of mercy and grace were not new – just the way that God was going to make manifest that mercy and grace was new.  Jesus brought change like no other ever seen before, but he stood on the foundations of the past mercy and grace which are the very identity of God.  Jesus, being a faithful Jew, understood the core identity of God proclaimed to Moses in Exodus 34:6:  The LORD passed before him, and proclaimed, “The LORD, the LORD, a God merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness.”  Jesus also new the core identity of the people of God when he proclaimed to the lawyer in Matthew 22:  He said to him, “‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ This is the greatest and first commandment. And a second is like it: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’  On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.”  Jesus did a very new thing by becoming human, suffering and dying on the cross to bring us mercy and grace.  But when Jesus did the new thing he stood on the foundational values and identity of God that had always been present. Change in the local congregation needs to look backward before venturing forward.                                                                                          

So, what does the past have to do with changing for the present and future?

 Simply living in the past as the culture changes brings failure.

  1. Simply rejecting and severing connects to the past brings failure.
  2. Knowing the core identity and values of the past is key to beginning a new thing.

 So how do congregations know what to preserve about the past and know what needs to change?  More on that in Part 2!  In the meantime, I would love your input regarding this topic.  Please click on comments up near the title of this blog.

~ by johnaholm on June 1, 2009.

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Test

This is a test of ScribeFire to post to the blog